The seventh day of the COPA v. Wright trial kicked off on Tuesday, exposing a glaring weakness in the latterâs argument to convince the court that he is the creator of Bitcoin.
When pressed by prosecutors, Craig Wright failed to name a single person outside of the public domain to whom he had sent Bitcoin under the name of Satoshi.
As summarized by @bitnorbert on X, COPA asked the computer scientist to confirm whether heâd ever sent BTC to anyone besides Hal Finney or Zooko Wilcox â the co-founder of ZCash.
Wright asserted that he had sent Bitcoin to hundreds of people, through a mix of his companies whose blockchain addresses were publicly understood as being owned by Satoshi Nakamoto. He said Zooko was not one of them, however, despite the cryptographer himself asserting heâd never received BTC from Satoshi.
When asked about the coins Satoshi had transferred to âhundredsâ of others, Wright said he doesnât âremember them all now.â Judge Edward James Mellor asked Wright to name just one, but he fell short.
Wright also faced questions about a public blog post heâd once purportedly signed to prove he was Satoshi that has since been fiercely criticized by experts. When asked whether âsigning sessionsâ would be invalid proof if the private keys behind them could be obtained by people besides Satoshi, Wright said âNot at all.â
âYou donât prove by having identity through possession of something. You prove by knowledge. Who you are. What you create,â Wright said.
Tuesday marks Wrightâs sixth day on the stand under cross-examination Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), a non-profit group backed by Meta, Block, and MicroStrategy.
The organizationâs goal is to prove that Wright has committed âindustrial scale forgeryâ, and prevent him from suing anybody who publicly proclaims that he isnât Satoshi, as heâs done in the past.
Reflecting on Tuesdayâs proceedings, @bitnorbert said it âwas the strongest showing of Bitcoiners in court today.â
Wright has spent his time under cross-examination aiming to discredit several expert witnesses who have called his defenseâs evidence forgeries â including Spencer Lynch, who was hired by his own legal team.
The post Craig Wright Fails To Name Anyone He Sent Bitcoin To As âSatoshiâ appeared first on CryptoPotato.
When pressed by prosecutors, Craig Wright failed to name a single person outside of the public domain to whom he had sent Bitcoin under the name of Satoshi.
Who Did Satoshi Send Bitcoin To?
As summarized by @bitnorbert on X, COPA asked the computer scientist to confirm whether heâd ever sent BTC to anyone besides Hal Finney or Zooko Wilcox â the co-founder of ZCash.
Wright asserted that he had sent Bitcoin to hundreds of people, through a mix of his companies whose blockchain addresses were publicly understood as being owned by Satoshi Nakamoto. He said Zooko was not one of them, however, despite the cryptographer himself asserting heâd never received BTC from Satoshi.
When asked about the coins Satoshi had transferred to âhundredsâ of others, Wright said he doesnât âremember them all now.â Judge Edward James Mellor asked Wright to name just one, but he fell short.
âGavin has talked about that now. It had no value at the time, My Lord. Most were pseudonymous,â he argued.
Wright also faced questions about a public blog post heâd once purportedly signed to prove he was Satoshi that has since been fiercely criticized by experts. When asked whether âsigning sessionsâ would be invalid proof if the private keys behind them could be obtained by people besides Satoshi, Wright said âNot at all.â
âYou donât prove by having identity through possession of something. You prove by knowledge. Who you are. What you create,â Wright said.
Wright âFalling Apartâ
Tuesday marks Wrightâs sixth day on the stand under cross-examination Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), a non-profit group backed by Meta, Block, and MicroStrategy.
The organizationâs goal is to prove that Wright has committed âindustrial scale forgeryâ, and prevent him from suing anybody who publicly proclaims that he isnât Satoshi, as heâs done in the past.
Reflecting on Tuesdayâs proceedings, @bitnorbert said it âwas the strongest showing of Bitcoiners in court today.â
âAll in all, it was another day of a cornered man helplessly falling apart in court, his counsel forced to sit in silence and watch,â he wrote to X on Tuesday. Judge Mellor, he noted, had to interrupt Wright several times to âget an answer out of him.â
Wright has spent his time under cross-examination aiming to discredit several expert witnesses who have called his defenseâs evidence forgeries â including Spencer Lynch, who was hired by his own legal team.
The post Craig Wright Fails To Name Anyone He Sent Bitcoin To As âSatoshiâ appeared first on CryptoPotato.