Welcome to the Off-Shore Club

The #1 Social Engineering Project in the world since 2004 !

Important Notice:

✅UPGRADE YOUR ACCOUNT TODAY TO ACCESS ALL OFF-SHORE FORUMS✅

[New]Telegram Channel

In case our domain name changes, we advise you to subscribe to our new TG channel to always be aware of all events and updates -
https://t.me/rtmsechannel

OFF-SHORE Staff Announcement: Do NOT sell Drugs here AT ALL, in short we mean 1 Drug Post = Instant persistent ban on the legit network forums ! Want to know what it means, try and see !
Happy Hacking !


30% Bonus on ALL Wallet Deposit this week For example, if you deposit $1000, your RTM Balance will be $1000 + $300 advertising wallet that can be used to purchase eligible products and service on forums or request withdrawal. The limit deposit to get the 30% bonus is $10,000 for a $3000 Marketplace wallet balance Bonus.

Deposit Now and claim 30% more balance ! - BTC/LTC/XMR


Always use a Mixer to keep Maximum anonimity ! - BTC to BTC or BTC to XMR

💣Exploit CVE-2024-57806 - Linux BTRFS Invalid Simple Quota Flag Setting

Gold

Maksim

Tactician
Staff member
Administrator
Instructor
USDT(TRC-20)
$450.0
CVE ID : CVE-2024-57806
Published : Jan. 11, 2025, 1:15 p.m. | 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
Description : In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix transaction atomicity bug when enabling simple quotas Set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature. With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b #146 [5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.604303] [5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproducer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -q -f /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction.
Severity: 0.0 | NA
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
Full story here:
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Friendly Disclaimer We do not host or store any files on our website except thread messages, most likely your DMCA content is being hosted on a third-party website and you need to contact them. Representatives of this site ("service") are not responsible for any content created by users and for accounts. The materials presented express only the opinions of their authors.
🚨 Do not get Ripped Off ! ⚖️ Deal with approved sellers or use RTM Escrow on Telegram
Gold
Mitalk.lat official Off Shore Club Chat


Gold

Panel Title #1

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Panel Title #2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Top